Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 vs Nitecore NU33 size comparison
The Nitecore NU33 is 18 mm (0.71 in) shorter than the Fenix HM65R-T V2.0, and 10.8 mm narrower at its widest point. Weights are published on different bases (listed vs with battery and headband), so compare them with care.
The Nitecore NU33 is 18 mm (0.71 in) shorter than the Fenix HM65R-T V2.0, and 10.8 mm narrower at its widest point. Weights are published on different bases (listed vs with battery and headband), so compare them with care.
Dimensions
| Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 Check price ↗ | Nitecore NU33 Check price ↗ | |
| Length | 80 mm (3.15 in) | 62 mm (2.44 in)−18 mm |
| Height | 46.8 mm (1.84 in) | 36 mm (1.42 in)−10.8 mm |
| Thickness | 34.9 mm (1.37 in) | 46 mm (1.81 in)+11.1 mm |
| Weight | 140 g with battery and headband | 96 g listed |
| Battery | 18650 / 2x CR123A | Built-in |
| Max output | 1,600 lm | 700 lm |
| Throw | 170 m | 135 m |
| Type | Headlamp / right-angle | Headlamp / right-angle |
| Source | fenixlighting.com sourced Listed 80 x 46.8 x 34.9 mm | batteryjunction.com sourced Retailer lists 62 x 46 x 36 mm |
We may earn a commission from these links, at no cost to you. Disclosure
HM65R-T V2.0 vs NU33: how they differ
Size and weight
The Nitecore NU33 is the shorter light: 62 mm (2.44 in) against 80 mm (3.15 in), a difference of 18 mm (23%). At its widest point the Nitecore NU33 is 10.8 mm slimmer (36 vs 46.8 mm). Weights are published on different bases (Fenix HM65R-T V2.0: 140 g with battery and headband; Nitecore NU33: 96 g listed), so they are not directly comparable.
Brightness and throw
The Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 is rated brighter: 1,600 lm maximum vs 700 lm for the Nitecore NU33, 129% more. For beam distance the Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 reaches further: 170 m vs 135 m rated throw (26% more).
Battery
The Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 runs on removable 18650 / 2x CR123A batteries; the Nitecore NU33 runs on a built-in rechargeable battery. Only the Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 lets you swap in a charged spare.
Type
Both are headlamps / right-angle lights in our catalog with a headlamp body.
Which should you buy?
Choose the Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 if you want more output (1,600 lm vs 700 lm), longer throw (170 m vs 135 m) and a removable cell you can swap. Choose the Nitecore NU33 if you want a shorter light (18 mm shorter), a slimmer profile (10.8 mm narrower) and a built-in battery with no separate cell to buy. We compare published size, weight, output, throw and battery only, not runtime, interface or build quality.
Check price ↗ Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 Check price ↗ Nitecore NU33
HM65R-T V2.0 vs NU33 FAQ
Which is smaller, the Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 or the Nitecore NU33?
The Nitecore NU33 is the shorter light: 62 mm (2.44 in) against 80 mm (3.15 in), a difference of 18 mm (23%). At its widest point the Nitecore NU33 is 10.8 mm slimmer (36 vs 46.8 mm). Weights are published on different bases (Fenix HM65R-T V2.0: 140 g with battery and headband; Nitecore NU33: 96 g listed), so they are not directly comparable.
Which is brighter, the Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 or the Nitecore NU33?
The Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 is rated brighter: 1,600 lm maximum vs 700 lm for the Nitecore NU33, 129% more. For beam distance the Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 reaches further: 170 m vs 135 m rated throw (26% more).
Do the Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 and Nitecore NU33 use the same battery?
The Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 runs on removable 18650 / 2x CR123A batteries; the Nitecore NU33 runs on a built-in rechargeable battery. Only the Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 lets you swap in a charged spare.